Rethinking Employment Verifications: Smarter Solutions for Rising Third‑Party Fees

As hiring costs continue to rise across the talent acquisition landscape, many organizations are feeling the pressure—especially when it comes to third‑party employment verification fees. These costs can quickly accumulate, often pushing teams beyond their approved hiring budgets and forcing difficult decisions about where to allocate resources. If your organization is finding itself in this situation, now may be the perfect time to explore alternative verification methods that maintain compliance and accuracy without sacrificing financial efficiency.

One effective strategy is to consider modern verification tools that offer the same essential data—sometimes even more—but at a more manageable cost. That’s where solutions like ABG VerifyXpress come into play. This service is designed to give hiring teams a comprehensive, reliable, and compliant way to verify employment history while avoiding the steep per‑transaction fees commonly associated with large third‑party providers.

VerifyXpress delivers detailed employer information, including truncated employer names, physical addresses, and EIN numbers, so users gain a full picture of a candidate’s previous employment. One of its most valuable features is the rapid confirmation of names and Social Security numbers through Taxpayer Identification Number matching. This approach helps reduce turnaround times and minimizes verification delays—two common bottlenecks in the hiring process.

Another advantage is its all‑inclusive coverage. VerifyXpress is able to verify all previous employers within the number of years your organization selects, including 1099 contractors, small businesses, boutique firms, and hard‑to‑reach employers that are often not found in major verification databases. This ensures your team receives a complete and accurate employment history, not just what’s available in a third‑party system.

Just as importantly, VerifyXpress maintains full state and federal compliance, giving you the confidence that your verification process aligns with regulatory requirements while staying budget‑friendly.

For organizations that are especially sensitive to cost thresholds—or whose verification fees frequently exceed budget caps—another smart alternative is to shift from employment verifications to professional references when appropriate. Professional references can offer meaningful insights into a candidate’s competencies, work ethic, communication style, and overall professional character. In many cases, these qualitative insights provide deeper value than a traditional verification alone, especially when evaluating cultural fit or role‑specific strengths.

By combining services like VerifyXpress with strategically collected professional references, organizations can maintain a rigorous and compliant hiring process while reducing or eliminating unnecessary verification expenses.

As the hiring landscape evolves, so does the need for smarter, more cost‑effective tools. Exploring alternatives such as ABG VerifyXpress ensures that your organization remains efficient, compliant, and financially responsible—without compromising on the quality or accuracy of your hiring decisions.

Picture of Professor Hootsworth

Professor Hootsworth

Professor Hootsworth guides AB Global, ensuring they remain true to their mission of delivering the Gold Standard in background screening. Whether he’s unraveling a tricky screening puzzle or delivering a lecture at Screening University, Hootsworth’s brown feathers and blue eyes have become a symbol of trust, integrity, and knowledge in the background screening world.

Subscribe To Our Blog

More Blog Posts

If you have reviewed a drug test report and seen the word dilute, you are not alone in pausing for a moment. It is one of the most misunderstood terms in workplace drug testing, and it often creates unnecessary concern. The truth is, dilution is a scientific measurement, not an accusation, and understanding what it really means can make all the difference.
Most organizations treat background screening as a one-time event. You check a candidate before they start, they clear, and the box is marked done. But risk does not stop at the offer letter. The people you screen on day one can change over the months and years that follow, which is why real protection means thinking beyond the initial check and screening across the entire employment lifecycle. Continuous monitoring is how you close that gap, for every role, not just the regulated ones.
You’ve heard of catfishing in online dating. Now it’s showing up in the workplace. But instead of someone pretending to be someone else on a dating app, imagine hiring a person who isn't who they claim to be. The resume looks legitimate. The LinkedIn profile looks legitimate. The interview goes well. The background check comes back clean. And then you discover that the person you hired isn't the person whose identity you verified. This isn't science fiction. It's becoming a very real challenge for employers.